By Jim Patterson
Holiday greetings from Louisiana, Texas, Nebraska, Missouri (state capitol building in Jefferson City), Kansas, Iowa and Colorado. Seven states and 2,300+ miles in two weeks as we are closing out the year with a bang at American Broadband. Looking forward to a couple weeks’ recharging at Patterson West in Fraser, Colorado, with family, then unpacking a few more boxes back in Missouri to properly celebrate the New Year. Happy (and safe) Holidays to each of you.
This week, after the normal market commentary and a brief peek into Apple iPhone 13 backlogs, we are going to succinctly define the five events that we thought had the biggest impact in 2021. It’s hard to limit our discussion to five and even harder to be brief, but we promise to do both. We will have a lengthier column on January 2 to preview the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show.
Many thanks to Fierce Telecom for putting together a robust virtual discussion on the future of rural broadband (part of their Digital Divide Summit). Our panel was chaired by Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson, and included Claude Aiken of WISPA, Prasad Kodaypak of Radisys, and Richard Rommes of Harmonic. A full replay of our panel is here. Looking forward to future opportunities to discuss this transformational topic.
Speaking of Craig, kudos and congratulations are in order as they announced the sale of MoffettNathanson to SVB Financial Group, a division of Silicon Valley Bank. Their telecom team insights influence our thinking here at The Sunday Brief, and I am sure we are not alone. A terrific way to close out the year for the entire MoffettNathanson team.
The week that was
Another choppy fortnight of trading as the Fab Five continued to gain (+US$228 billion over the last two weeks) and the Telco Top Five marked time (US$-1 billion). Apple and Facebook accounted for all of the Fab Five change, with small gains at Google and Amazon netting against a modest loss for Microsoft. Whether a Santa Claus rally will propel 2021 gains above 2020’s US$2.57 trillion level is anyone’s guess, but our beginning of year prediction that we would not see pandemic gains like 2020 in 2021 is likely to be dead wrong. The ramifications of market capitalization concentration have yet to be seen, but, as we have chronicled in many Briefs, wireless and wireline telecommunications are now features of the cloud, not separate standalone businesses.
What is still undecided is the level of broadband competition Comcast and Charter will be facing, and the entire telecom sector is being pummeled as a result. Shortly after our last Brief was published, Comcast Cable CEO & President Dave Watson presented at the UBS Global Telecommunications, Media, and Technology (TMT) Conference (transcript here). Two quotes stuck out to us:
On competition: “We’re staring at a pretty competitive environment will continue to be so. So our focus is how do we redefine the category. We’ve done that. We’ve kept up and then some with speed. We have ubiquitous plant capability. We deliver a ubiquitous 1.2 [gigabit] (corrected by company after the call) downstream. We have very solid upstream with a great road map that continue to increase speeds, both down and up.”
On fixed wireless: “The fixed wireless side, we’re looking at. It’s not a material issue still at all from our perspective… we anticipate things. Right now, we are at 40 per cent of our footprint that’s been overbuilt from … the fiber overbuild between the major telcos. And when you read all of their announcements and everything that came out yesterday and then some, you look at another 15 points. So you get from the 40 per cent goes to 55 per cent over time. That still leaves 45 per cent that’s not — that we have not addressed and that we’re still going at it hard. There’s still DSL that’s out there. There’s still non-fiber footprint that we will go at… we take it seriously. It’s a real issue, but we’re not having to make trade-offs between a core service, which I imagine is very important to them, their main wireless product. And they say things like, “Well, we haven’t had to yet make any trade-offs.” I think the yet is pretty important. So we’re going to continue. We’re not standing still.”
These two comments, combined with Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg’s predictions at the same conference about anticipated fixed wireless market share gains created anxiety concerning Comcast. From December 6 to 9, Comcast lost approximately US$18 billion in market capitalization or 8 per cent of it’s beginning of week market value. The stock price has only slightly recovered since then (up US$1.04 or 2.2%). From their recent high on September 7, Comcast has lost more than 20 per cent of its market capitalization. Investors are getting nervous.
We think this anxiety is unfounded for several reasons. First, Comcast has a lot of fiber deployed deep into their network in nearly every market. They are extremely disciplined and future-focused in their capital spending. Second, as we will discuss below with respect to YouTube TV and Hulu Live, streaming and linear cable costs are beginning to converge. The promise of materially lower costs for streaming companies is going to be lessened – it clearly is not in the best interests of content providers to disadvantage their largest purchaser (Comcast). Finally, Verizon’s fiber expansion in their 5G Home Internet markets is slowing (see map here and search on Richmond (VA), Little Rock (AR), Memphis (TN) or pretty much any other secondary market where Comcast is the incumbent cable provider). Bottom line: Comcast will face competiiton in some major markets – Atlanta, Chicago, Houston and Miami will become increasingly intense, but it’s hard to make the case, absent material fiber deployments that we aren’t sure Verizon’s balance sheet can accommodate, that Verizon is going to own 40+% share of Home Internet.
Speaking of content, Google’s cable replacement product, YouTube TV, failed to reach a deal with the Disney family of channels (which include ESPN, just two weeks prior to the College Football Playoff). While their announcement here says little about their negotiating strategy, their December 13 update a little lower on the page says a lot:
“Our ask of Disney, as with all of our partners, is to treat YouTube TV like any other TV provider – by offering us the same rates that services of a similar size pay, across Disney’s channels for as long as we carry them.”
Google’s position appears to be that they aren’t receiving a competitive rate relative to similarly sized partners. We think this is likely a comparison to linear providers (versus a comparison to Hulu Live, who is owned by Disney). To their credit, YouTube TV has already announced that they will be lowering the price of their service by US$15/ mo. (to US$49.99/ month) while the blackout is in effect. This allows many of their sports-hungry customers to add a very attractive sports pack tier (US$10.99/ mo.) to make up for the lack of ESPN. All of this (plus Hulu Live’s already announced price increase to US$70/ mo.) leads us to believe that YouTube TV rates are headed higher, and the retail gap between Xfinity, Spectrum, and other cable vs. streamers is going to narrow in 2022. For a deeper dive, have a look at the last Sunday Brief here where cable industry veteran John Malone discusses the death of “giant bundles” but leaves the door open for small/ medium packages.
Finally, MoffettNathanson was not the only surprise telecom-related acquisition last week. Last Tuesday, Ookla announced that they would be acquiring the wireless measurement giant RootMetrics (Ookla blog lost here). The to-be-acquired company has been very busy finishing up their 2H 2021 measurement cycle, and our preliminary results (through Thursday, December 16) are nearby. Verizon has moved back into sole winner position in 52 markets or 54 per cent of the total metros measured. Not where they were in 2H 2020, but headed in that direction. Of interest is the “T-Mobile/ Verizon Tie” line which has grown to five (four of these came since our last report). Not the magnitude we saw with AT&T’s FirstNet-related burst in 1H 2021, but if that category grows into double digits it might signal RootMetrics recognition of T-Mobile’s mid-band gains (Ookla already has T-Mobile on top of Verizon – more here).
Apple iPhone 13 availability – our latest check
In what has become it’s own Sunday Brief attraction, we have continued to post weekly backlogs using Saturdays as our baseline day of the week. We are entering the 13th week since the iPhone 13 family was launched – said another way, we are only 36 weeks or so away from the next iPhone launch – yet we face constraints in the flagship iPhone 13 Pro model as the chart below shows:
The problem is most acute at T-Mobile, who is using the iPhone 13 Pro in their headline marketing offer. As of Decemebr 18, 11 of 16 possible storage/color combinations had shipping dates of January 18 or later, with many delayed into early February. That’s an indication of both the offer’s success (to switchers as well as legacy Sprint customers) but also highlights the fragile nature of the supply chain, even for Apple, in 2021.
The other interesting development can be seen with the iPhone 13 backlog. Clearly Verizon’s existing customer offer has had an impact on the availability of the 128 GB model. This presages higher upgrade costs but also lower churn at Big Red in 4Q 2021 results:
The contrast between AT&T and Verizon is striking. We fully expect the iPhone 13 backlog to clear up in the next two weeks, and will focus our attention on the iPhone 13 Pro availability in our next report.
Note: As we went to “press” Disney and YouTube TV announced they had reached a settlement. Sports will live on in the Patterson household on New Year’s Eve!
