LEO Satellites May Be Of Interest To Operators That Offer Broadband Services, writes JUSTIN VAN DER LANDE.

Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites are becoming increasingly important for the telecoms industry due to their potential to deliver 1Gbit/s broadband worldwide. Indeed, this has driven major technology companies to enter the telecoms market, notably Elon Musk’s SpaceX. LEO satellites operate 500–2000km above the earth and travel at 27 000 km/h. They offer high data throughput and low latency (as low as 20ms). This high data throughput is achieved by using high wireless frequencies in the Ka band and employing enormous numbers of satellites (thousands to tens of thousands more than in older fleets).

LEO satellites are smaller than geostationary satellites, but many more are needed for worldwide coverage. The low orbit reduces the latency in services, lowers the launch costs and enables higher data throughput compared to previous generations of satellites. However, hundreds or even thousands must be deployed to achieve this high throughput and provide coverage worldwide. SpaceX launches 60 satellites at a time.

Ground equipment.

Satellites have traditionally been accessed and tracked via parabolic-dish antennas. This equipment is poorly suited to LEO constellations, in which numerous satellites rapidly and simultaneously cross over the ground receiver’s field of view. New antennas with electronically scanned apertures (ESAs) can track large numbers of satellites without physical movement. Ground stations can incorporate ESAs in order to route connectivity services back into terrestrial telecoms providers’ networks.

User equipment.

ESAs currently cost several thousand US dollars, though manufacturing costs may become substantially lower as the volume produced increases. This is possibly the single most significant issue to overcome in order to use LEO satellites for residential services. An antenna module needs to cost just USD15 in order to be able to create a USD200 user terminal (modem and a battery). This is something that Starlink has achieved with its in-house ESA solution.

Both Starlink and OneWeb have filed blanket licence requests with the FCC for 5 million and 1.5 million user terminals, respectively, for the USA. Amazon intends to file a request to enable it to connect “tens of millions” of users around the world.

There are some key considerations for the telecoms industry

Starlink, owned by SpaceX, is one of the three main LEO satellite constellations; the others are run by Telesat and OneWeb. Some other credible solutions are starting to enter the market; the most notable of which are Amazon’s Kuiper and the Hongyun Project from China.

The failures of LEO satellite companies LeoSat and Teledesic show that this is a high-risk market. However, the rewards will be significant if the goal of providing high-speed, low-latency internet to any location in the world can be achieved. All of the current LEO satellite providers are targeting enterprise services such as connectivity for airlines and remote oil and gas facilities, as well as corporate networks, government and broadcast services. In addition, many are selling mobile backhaul and IoT services to telecoms providers. Starlink also targets consumer services and is directly competing with terrestrial telecoms service providers.

The key considerations for the telecoms industry are as follows.

LEO satellites could be used to provide fixed broadband services worldwide, and may be used to replace those with connection rates of less than 30Mbit/s. This is a significant proportion of all broadband services. Even in developed markets such as the UK, 5 per cent of households only have access to broadband with speeds of less than 10Mbit/s.

There has been a high failure rate for LEO satellites, but the resources from Starlink mean that success in delivering a worldwide broadband service is now likely.

Current high-speed data services (as found in urban areas) for fibre, DSL, 4G and 5G may remain more competitive (in terms of performance and cost) than LEO-based services in the short term. The current download speeds for Starlink are only 36–60Mbit/s.

Starlink and others will need to apply for telecoms licences if they wish to launch services such as voice. Starlink has applied to become a basic International Telecoms Services provider in Canada. It has received approval to provide 1 million terminals in the USA and has expanded its request to 5 million terminals (about 4% of households).

LEO satellites could also be used for other remote services such as those linked to marine transport and government services.

The potential of LEO satellites is great, but there are risks

SpaceX is significantly ahead of all other LEO satellite players; it has more satellites and a faster launch rate. It is expected to have launched over 1000 satellites by 1Q 2021, and will therefore be able to offer services worldwide. However, SpaceX will also need to build more ground stations; one estimate suggests that 123 ground stations are required for 4400 satellites.

Current tests indicate that LEO satellite-based services can provide bandwidths that are comparable to those from DSL or fibre-to-the-cabinet. The costs for such services are not clear, but it is thought that they will be around US$80 per month, with installation costs of US$200–US$300. SpaceX has told investors that it is using Starlink to target a US$1 trillion addressable market; this represents two thirds of the total fixed and mobile revenue worldwide in 2019, thereby demonstrating SpaceX’s ambition.

However, not every telecoms regulator will grant SpaceX access to their market for political or economic reasons. Furthermore, SpaceX only has offices in the USA, and there is no easy way to build further offices quickly in order to supply, install and bill for services on a worldwide basis. Local co-operation with telecoms operators is therefore likely to be the preferred go-to-market model. In addition, this scale of LEO satellite constellation has never been tested, managed or used, and there may be unforeseen issues before full services can go live.

• Justin is a Principal Analyst for Analysys Mason.