Apple’s main trial activity with Epic finished in May, with both sides now awaiting a decision from Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on the matter.

Tech giant Apple’s legal team has submitted a decision by the US Supreme Court about the NCAA to the court over its lawsuit with Epic Games, claiming the decision “provides guidance” that the judge should consider for her own decision over the fate of the App Store.

Apple’s main trial activity with Epic finished in May, with both sides now awaiting a decision from Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on the matter.

While the wait continues, Apple’s lawyers are taking advantage of a Supreme Court decision to help its case, AppleInsider reported.

The filing, spotted by Stephen Totilo, refers to the decision on the case of the National Collegiate Athletic Association v Alston, et al.

“The Supreme Court’s opinion provides guidance on several issues in this case, including the analysis of procompetitive business justifications, substantially less restrictive alternatives to challenged restraints, and remedies,” writes Apple’s lawyers.

In that NCAA decision, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that the NCAA was immune from federal antitrust law.

The unanimous ruling offered that attempts by the NCAA to limit compensation to student athletes, in a bid to keep them classed as amateur, should be subject to rule of reason analysis that apply to antitrust cases.

In explaining the submission, Richard Hoeg of Hoeg Law said the Supreme Court “put out a whole lot of language saying courts should be very careful about rule of reason findings”.

The need to be careful “undoubtedly helps Apple,” Hoeg continued, with the filing being Apple “making sure that the judge knows that SCOTUS just said all of this on the rule that she is using to evaluate Apple’s business practices.”

Hoeg also believes Gonzalez Rogers “definitely knew” about the Supreme Court decision before Apple’s filing was made.